WebF Answers to corporate representative deposition questions (ORCP 39(c)(6); ORCP 39); Responses to third-party subpoenas; 2. ORCP 36C permits an order limiting discovery to protect a party from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: F That the discovery not be had; WebDec 9, 2011 · Originally appeared in the OSB Corporate Counsel Section's Corporate Counselor November 2011 issue.. Most attorneys are familiar with ORCP 39 C(6), which allows parties to take the deposition of an organization rather than an individual.But fail to be familiar with how to prepare a deponent for an ORCP 39 C(6) deposition and you could …
Attorney Fees – Litigation Section - Oregon State Bar
WebThe Oregon Revised Statutes are the codified laws of the State of Oregon. The ORS is published every two years. Each edition incorporates all laws, and changes to laws, enacted by the Legislative Assembly through the odd-numbered year regular session referenced in the volume titles for that edition. The 2024 Edition does not include changes to ... Webto ORCP 65 or other provision of law or by court order. e. “OJD Temporary Policy” means the OJD Temporary Policy During COVID-19-Related Restrictions on Court Operations, as updated per the requirements set out in this order. f. “Providing proof” of either receiving a COVID-19 vaccine dose or administration great house nicole krauss
Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure Maintained and Compiled by …
WebLynn, 344 Or 65 (2008). In Gwin, the defendant sought to depose an individual who had percipient, non-expert, involvement in the underlying subject matter of the case, but whom the plaintiff also intended to call as an expert witness at trial. WebOct 26, 2024 · Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders (a) Preliminary Injunction (1) Notice. The court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party. … WebApr 21, 2024 · In addition to damages, the arbitration panel appointed a referee under ORCP 65 to determine whether plaintiff was entitled to attorney fees. Defense counsel argued that it had never left “safe harbor” and that refusing to stipulate to an incorrect statement of the law should not invalidate the safe harbor protections. great house music songs